
My blog is worth $5,645.40.
How much is your blog worth?

Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 at 04:06 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Two stories:
First, this one about one of the Obama girls going on spring break with her class to Oaxaca Mexico. Initial press reports about it on the Internet were "scrubbed".
An AFP report that President Barack Obama’s 13-year-old daughter, Malia, is spending spring break in Oaxaca, Mexico appears to have been completely scrubbed from the Internet news sites that first reported it. Pictures have appeared in Mexican magazine Quién.com allegedly showing Malia visiting Oaxaca.
AFP, the French news agency, first reported around mid-day Monday that Malia Obama was vacationing in Mexico with 12 friends under the protection of 25 Secret Service agents and a number of local police officers.
Second, this one, which happened an hour ago:
A strong 7.4-magnitude earthquake hit Mexico on Tuesday, shaking central and southern parts of the country, collapsing a pedestrian bridge and swaying buildings in Mexico City. Plaster fell from ceilings and windows broke in the center of the capital, but the president said there were no immediate reports of major damage.
The initial quake near the borders of Oaxaca and Guerrero states was followed by a less powerful, magnitude-5.1 aftershock that also was felt in the capital.
Oaxaca. Hmmmmm. First the first daughter goes there, THEN there's an earthquake. COINCIDENCE??????
(And by the way, she's okay)
P.S. The "scrubbing" of the Malia Obama story isn't a big mystery. Kristina Schake, Communications Director to the First Lady, confirmed to Politico's Dylan Byers that the White House that it asked news agencies to remove the story:
From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest. We have reminded outlets of this request in order to protect the privacy and security of these girls.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, March 20, 2012 at 03:58 PM in Disasters, Obama Opposition | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
A strong geomagnetic storm is racing from the Sun toward Earth, and its expected arrival on Thursday could affect power grids, airplane routes and space-based satellite navigation systems, U.S. space weather experts said.
The storm, a big cloud of charged particles flung from the Sun at about 4.5 million miles per hour (7.2 million km per hour), was spawned by a pair of solar flares, scientists said.
This is probably the strongest such event in nearly six years, and is likely more intense than a similar storm in late January, said Joseph Kunches, a space weather specialist at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 at 04:45 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Not a good time to be in the midwest. Here's one of many tornados that hit today (this one in Indiana)
Note: There are reports that Henryville, Indiana is "gone". This tornado is near Henryville, and may be one of the culprits.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Friday, March 02, 2012 at 04:19 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
There's a lot of space debris in space, orbitting the Earth. When those orbits decay, as they do over time, the debris burns up upon re-entering the Earth's atmosphere.
No biggie.
Unless the debris is really big to begin with -- like an out-of-use satellite. Some of the debris survives re-entry and crashes to Earth. We've seen a few of those recently: An old NASA 6-ton atmospheric research satellite came tumbling down in September, and a 3-ton German science satellite followed suit in October. The surviving parts of those old satellites ended up in the oceans.
But there's another killer out there: the Russian Phobos-Ground satellite. It's way bigger than those other two satellites -- it's 14.6 tons.
Also, it's not an old satellite. In fact, it wasn't supposed to be a satellite at all. It was launched in November 2011, and a glitch left it stranded in orbit around Earth instead of bound for Mars to collect soil samples.
And now it is coming back down to Earth, carrying within it about 12 tons of highly toxic fuel that was supposed to take it to Mars. Some think that the fuel is probably frozen, and it will become UNfrozen during re-entry, and then spread in tiny droplets over some area -- perhaps even a populated area.
The Russian space agency Roscosmos' latest forecast has the unmanned Phobos-Ground probe falling out of Earth's orbit Sunday or Monday, with the median time placing it over the Indian Ocean just north of Madagascar. Of course, these is the same agency which built and launched the piece-of-crap probe, so who knows where it will come crashing down.
London and New York are along its flight path.
More info here.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, January 12, 2012 at 01:14 PM in Disasters, Science/Technology | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
EDIS Number: PW-20111013-32671-USA
Date / time: 13/10/2011 16:10:18 [UTC]
Event: Power Outage
Area: North-America
Country: USA
State/County: State of Connecticut
Location: Greenwich
Number of Deads: N/A
Number of Injured: N/A
Number of Infected: N/A
Number of Missing: N/A
Number of Affected: 14507 person(s)
Number of Evacuated: N/A
Damage level: Heavy
Description:A squirrel is to blame for the power outage that left half of Greenwich customers in the dark this morning. CL&P spokesman Mitch Gross said there was a problem at the substation in the Cos Cob area of town. A squirrel got into the substation and caused an explosion around 8:15 this morning. The explosion created flames that soared 150 feet into the air. CL&P reported that 14,507 customers lost power as a result of the incident, including a police station, whose generators did not work. Officers were in the dark, but now have the power back on. They never lost their emergency phone lines. Additionally, traffic lights were reported out, causing traffic problems, and people were stuck in elevators. CL&P has 27,910 customers in Greenwich. Gross said that the power is returning to the area, and it should be returned to all customers in a few hours. The squirrel did not survive the explosion.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, October 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Problem: Texas wildfires!
Is It Serious?: The worst in Texas history. The wildfires, which can now be observed from space, move incredibly fast, as this video from the Texas Park & Wildlife people shows:
Have these fires been around for a while? Oh yes, this is wildfire season - it's been going on for months.
But thank God for the TEABAGGERS TO THE RESCUE:
(Reuters) - Texas lawmakers are set to slash funding for the agency responsible for fighting wildfires in the midst of a historic wildfire season in which some 2.5 million acres have burned.
The Texas Forest Service faces almost $34 million in budget cuts over the next two years, roughly a third of the agency's total budget. The cuts are in both the House and Senate versions of the proposed state budget.
The Forest Service has about 200 firefighters and offers assistance grants to volunteer fire departments. Assistance grants are likely to take the biggest hit.
I swear to God... these people are so anti-government they're all going to end up dead.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, September 06, 2011 at 04:25 PM in Disasters, Tea Party | Permalink | Comments (1)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
A few days ago, I mocked Joseph Farah, editor and owner of World Net Daily, for his ridiculous stance that God is trying to get our attention by sending an earthquake and a tornado. That's right. God, who could, if he wanted, make the clouds form the words "Yo! Listen up!" decided to get our attention by setting off some naturally occuring events that we would mistake for an earthquake or a tornado.
Sillinesss.
So natch, presidential hopeful Michelle Bachmann gets on the bandwagon. Speaking in Florida:
She hailed the tea party as being common-sense Americans who understand government shouldn't spend more than it takes in, know they're taxed enough already and want government to abide by the Constitution.
"I don't know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians. We've had an earthquake; we've had a hurricane. He said, 'Are you going to start listening to me here?' Listen to the American people, because the American people are roaring right now. They know government is on a morbid obesity diet, and we've got to rein in the spending."
That's right. The earthquake and hurricane that missed (but came near) D.C. were both about fiscal restraint.
UPDATE: Her campaign manager does damage control: "She was joking".
Riiiiiiiight. Let her say that.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, August 29, 2011 at 11:47 AM in Disasters, Election 2012 | Permalink | Comments (3)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The Bartonsville Covered Bridge was a wooden covered bridge in the village of Bartonsville, Vermont. It was built in 1870 by Sanford Granger. The bridge was a lattice truss style with a 151 foot span across the Williams River.

Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, August 29, 2011 at 11:40 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The talk this morning seems to be, "Well, it wasn't as bad as predicted for NYC and other areas. So did local officials over react?"
Facepalm.
First of all, the North Carolina coast saw some heavy damage, and so did Vermont. So if NYC and other areas in between managed to go relatively unscathed, then it was only a matter of luck.
Second of all, at the risk of sounding obvious but apparently some people need to be reminded, weather forecasting is not an EXACT science. I mean, the number of factors that go into whether there will be coastal flooding on any particular beach are huge. There's the wind speed, the timing of the tides, the amount of rain, the topography of the beach, the topography of the ocean floor, etc. There's absolutely no way any forecaster can predict exactly how it will be for every inch of coastline.
Which brings me to the local officials, some of whom are being criticized for exercising an overabundance of caution by calling for evacuations, etc.
Don't listen to your critics, guys. You are supposed to exercise an overabundance of caution. We learned that from Katrina, if nothing else.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, August 29, 2011 at 09:19 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The latest NOAA discussion notes that Hurricane Irene has weakened slightly, which is (quite obviously) good news.
However, the important word is "slightly". For the next 12-24 hours, it probably won't change much in strength (either way) which means it will still have maximum winds as high as 105 mph. Nothing to sneeze at.
By comparison, the Great New England Hurricane of 1938 was a Category 3. This will only be Cat 1 when it hits New England.
For NYC:
...PROBABILITY OF TROPICAL STORM/HURRICANE CONDITIONS... THE CHANCE FOR HURRICANE CONDITIONS AT THIS TIME IS 4 TO 11 PERCENT. ALSO...THE CHANCE FOR TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS AT THIS TIME IS UP TO 72 PERCENT. THIS REPRESENTS A GENERAL UPWARD TREND SINCE THE LAST FORECAST. THE ONSET OF TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS COULD START AS EARLY AS SATURDAY NIGHT...AND HURRICANE CONDITIONS COULD ARRIVE AS EARLY AS SUNDAY MORNING. ...STORM SURGE AND STORM TIDE... IT IS STILL TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT HEIGHTS OF COMBINED STORM SURGE AND TIDE WATERS FOR SPECIFIC LOCATIONS WITHIN THE FORECAST AREA TO BE CAUSED BY HURRICANE IRENE. MUCH DEPENDS ON THE PRECISE SIZE...INTENSITY AND TRACK OF THE SYSTEM AS IT APPROACHES THE COAST. BASED ON THE FORECAST TRACK OF IRENE THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR SEVERAL FEET OF SURGE...PARTICULARLY IN WESTERN LONG ISLAND SOUND...NEW YORK HARBOR...AND THE BACK SHORE BAYS OF LONG ISLAND AND NEW YORK CITY. THESE TIDAL CONDITIONS WOULD BE EXACERBATED BY BATTERING SURF. ...WINDS... AS HURRICANE IRENE MOVES CLOSER...THE THREAT FOR SUSTAINED HIGH WINDS IS LIKELY TO INCREASE. THE LATEST FORECAST IS FOR STRONG TROPICAL STORM FORCE TO HURRICANE FORCE WINDS FROM SUNDAY MORNING TO EARLY SUNDAY EVENING. TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS ARE CURRENTLY FORECAST TO BEGIN AFFECTING THE AREA SATURDAY NIGHT AFTER MIDNIGHT. A GENERAL CONCERN SHOULD BE FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF AT LEAST DAMAGING WINDS SOMEWHERE WITHIN THE AREA. ...INLAND FLOODING... A FLOOD WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR THE ENTIRE AREA. SEE LATEST FORECAST FOR LATEST INFORMATION. LISTEN FOR POSSIBLE FLOOD WARNINGS FOR YOUR LOCATION...AND BE READY TO ACT IF FLOODING RAINS OCCUR.
Nate Silver thinks this could be a very expensive disaster for NYC. Probably because of the storm surge.
For us here in Winston-Salem (central NC), it'll be almost nothing. The real winds will be in New England, as the chart below shows.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Friday, August 26, 2011 at 11:02 AM in Disasters, Weather | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Direct hit on Sunday, it looks like.
It will have weakened some, but sustained winds of 50 mph and more are certainly possible, with gusts as high as 100 mph. Don't expect any flights to/from NYC that day.
Then there's the storm search which could bring waters right into the heart of Manhatten.
Just saying.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, August 25, 2011 at 02:13 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
An interesting press release from the Smithsonian National Zoo on how animals reacted (and foretold) the earthquake. The winning earthquake predictor appears to be the red ruffed lemurs.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 01:59 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Steve Benen is right. Can this be any sillier?
So, there was an earthquake. The president was made aware of it. There was no serious damage, no casualties, nothing for emergency response teams to do, and nothing for Obama to do. He was kept apprised and went about his afternoon. I don't know why this is supposed to be interesting.
I realize conservatives are a creative bunch, and can manufacture outrage out of whole cloth, but even for the right, making a fuss about this is just childish. Indeed, at a certain level, it's counter-productive -- shouldn't the right be more selective, going on the attack when Obama actually messes up, so it would have a greater impact?
In the case of the earthquake, if there'd been an actual disaster, and Obama sat around reading a children's book while Americans were dying, I could see conservatives getting upset. If Obama had been told a month ago that a serious disaster was poised to happen, and he told the geologists, "All right, you've covered your ass now" before ignoring the warnings, the right would have plenty of room for criticism.
But this is weak tea. When pundits are reduced to wanting to see the president "pretend to do something," you know the discourse has badly gone off the rails.
Indeed, if we're going to have a substantive discussion about politics, policy, and natural disasters, perhaps the better place to start would be with Republican efforts to cut funding for the U.S. Geological Survey, which monitors earthquakes, and mocking investments in studying seismic activities.
Given the circumstances, this seems far more interesting.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 10:28 AM in Disasters, Obama Opposition | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 09:59 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
For those keeping score -- and I'm sure most aren't -- as of May 23, Mother Nature had unleashed a whopping 1,151 twisters in the U.S.
That's more than double the 506 that had touched ground by this same time in 2010.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 02, 2011 at 02:28 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
And you can tell this guy is from Massachusetts.....
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 02, 2011 at 11:01 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (1)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, April 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
It just happened within the past few minutes. 7.4 on the Richter scale. Tsunami warnings. Apparently, the same epicenter as the last one.
This can't be good, especially for that trouble nuke plant.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, April 07, 2011 at 11:02 AM in Breaking News, Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
NOVA tonight... entitled Japan’s Killer Quake.
It's only been a few weeks, and yet the events in Japan are already receding into the memory's past for those outside the ravaged country. The NOVA special will help us remember that the whole catastrophe is far from over.
From all accounts, it is not disaster porn (although there is, of course, non-gory footage of the earthquake and tsunami's destructive power). It is a sobering account of what happened, what is happening, and could it happen again.
And while you're watching it, remember that it is the kind of reporting that Republicans in Congress want to kill.
A preview:
More:
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 at 01:10 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
This is terrifying.
The video starts calmly enough. Some water moving down the street. Then, within minutes, it is tearing up cars and houses. This guy was dangerously close, but safe.
If you want to see what it looked like before the video, check out Google Maps.
Then watch this:
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, March 14, 2011 at 03:37 PM in Disasters, Youtube | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Reportedly, this weekend at a Watauga County Republican Party convention, our own Senator Virginia Foxx had this to say about the Japan earthquake and tsunami:
It is a sign that God is still in charge.
Yeah. Right.
It has nothing to do with fault lines and shifting tectonic plates.
It was God. He looked down at us and thought to Himself, "Hmmmm. I think I'll make my presence known. Because they all look so complacent down there. Gotta exert my authorit-tay. Gotta show 'em who's the boss. I suppose I could miraculously cure some disease overnight.... Nah! I think I'll smite Japan with a devestating earthquake. Yeah. That'll show 'em!!"
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, March 14, 2011 at 01:22 PM in Disasters, Local Interest | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, March 14, 2011 at 12:58 PM in Disasters, Social Networking | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Of the MANY things to write about relating to what's going on in Japan (e.g., the earthquake, the tsunami, the horrific loss of life, the possible nuclear meltdown, the effects on wordwide finance and industry, the meaning for the future of the nuclear industry, etc.), I can think of nothing more irrelevant and wasteful than to report on 50 Cent's tweets about Japan.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, March 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
For years, people have been asking why we build nuclear plants on earthquake fault lines.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Saturday, March 12, 2011 at 08:43 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
If your Facebook or Twitter feed starts going off with buzz about a massive California earthquake in the next few hours, don't worry. It's only a test. A drill is planned by natural disaster experts at San Diego State University to test how social media would be used to respond to a crisis.
Unless, of course, there is an actual earthquake in California... which would be an unfortunate coincidence.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Friday, September 24, 2010 at 12:33 PM in Disasters, Social Networking | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
An oil rig has exploded 80 miles off the coast of Louisiana, with 12 people overboard and one missing, the Coast Guard said Thursday morning.
UPDATE: The rig is owned by Mariner Energy. And leased to....??? Well, we don't know yet.
UPDATE #2: It bears mentioning that this is NOT a deep-sea oil well, unlike BP's Deepwater Horizon, and reports are that this was a production platform (again unlike BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling platform). So that's all good news. On the other hand, it exploded.... so, not so good.
UPDATE #3: Local news is reporting that Coast Guard has spotted mile-long "oil sheen" emanating from the platform.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, September 02, 2010 at 11:51 AM in Breaking News, Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
As of 11AM EDT Hurricane Earl is still tracking toward the outer banks/DC area as a category 3 and is still projected to turn in time to spare the region the full brunt. The NHC image shows why this is really a close call: presently, Earl is headed right at the middle of the east coast and some intensification is still possible. But it is forecast to begin curving more toward the north.
Forecasters sound confident it will turn, but the details of that expected curve could mean the difference between a storm that's barely noticeable and one that buzzes right up one of the most densely populated regions in the nation with almost surgical precision. A major hurricane plowing that stretch of coast could well rank among the most costly disasters in US history. Given the sheer number of homes and people in that swath, even a weakened or relatively distant Earl producing scattered and so-called minor damage could add up to big bucks and misery.
The President was briefed by FEMA head Craig Fugate a short time ago on the potential impacts of Hurricane Earl on the East Coast and New England. Emergency response teams are in place, some areas will be evacuated, and contingency evacuation plans for other regions are ready should the need arise. Residents in or near the outer banks of North Carlina and the greater DC metro area should complete preparations today. A Special Alert has been posted at North Carolina DOT. More info can be found at FEMA and GetReady.gov.
Update: Some noon models show a slight shift toward the west. Which is not the way we want it go.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, September 01, 2010 at 02:47 PM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Now that the well is capped, there seems to be relatively little effect on the environment -- at least as not as much as anticipated.
I'm not complaining, of course.... but one wonders why the environmental effects aren't devastating.
The answer, possibly, is this:
A newly discovered type of oil-eating microbe suddenly is flourishing in the Gulf of Mexico and gobbling up the BP spill at a much faster rate than expected, scientists reported Tuesday.Scientists discovered the new microbe while studying the underwater dispersion of millions of gallons of oil spilled since the explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig.Also, the microbe works without significantly depleting oxygen in the water, researchers reported in the online journal Sciencexpress."Our findings ... suggest that a great potential for intrinsic bioremediation of oil plumes exists in the deep-sea," lead researcher Terry Hazen, a microbial ecologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab in Berkeley, California, said in a statement.The data is also the first ever on microbial activity from a deep-water dispersed oil plume, Hazen said.Now, this is clearly good news, but it strikes me as a little oddly convenient. There have been massive oil spills before -- why hasn't this microbe appeared then?
Weird.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, August 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (3)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, August 23, 2010 at 10:51 AM in Disasters | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, July 19, 2010 at 09:22 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
This is an actual board game that came out in the 1970s:
Full story here.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Friday, July 09, 2010 at 09:55 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The BP oil spill has upped the ante. This is breaking news....
Oil gushing at spill site after vent damaged
Cap removed after sub hits vent; 2 cleanup workers die in separate eventsBREAKING NEWSNBC News and news servicesupdated 12:53 p.m. ET, Wed., June 23, 2010WASHINGTON - Oil was again gushing from the BP spill site on Wednesday after the company was forced to remove the containment cap when a robotic submarine hit a vent. The news came as officials also reported two deaths of people who had been hired for the response effort.
BP hoped to reinstall the cap later Wednesday after fixing the vent and checking for safety.
When the robot bumped the system, gas rose through the vent that carries warm water down to prevent ice-like crystals from forming in the cap, Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said.
The cap was removed and crews were checking to see if crystals had formed before putting it back on. Allen did not say how long that might take.
"There's more coming up than there had been, but it's not a totally unconstrained discharge," Allen said.
In the meantime, a different system was still burning oil on the surface.
Before the problem with the containment cap, it had collected about 700,000 gallons of oil in the previous 24 hours. Another 438,000 gallons was burned.
The current worst-case estimate of what's spewing into the Gulf is about 2.5 million gallons a day. Anywhere from 67 million to 127 million gallons have spilled since the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig that killed 11 workers and blew out a well 5,000 feet underwater. BP PLC was leasing the rig from owner Transocean Ltd.
The deaths reported Wednesday were not tied to the containment operation. The Coast Guard said the workers had been involved in cleanup operations did that their deaths did not appear to be work related.
One death was a boat captain who died of a gunshot wound, a Coast Guard spokesman said. Further details were not immediately available.
A "gunshot wound"? Is the oil spill armed now?
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 12:57 PM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
I miss Kaye Grogan. She was a columnist for Renew America, a right-wing Christian/political website started by many-times presidential candidate Alan Keyes. Kaye was crazy, and her columns had the added pleasure of being written in the worst English-torturing manner. I mean, worse than my writing even.
Kaye's columns quietly disappeared from the Intertubes a year or so ago, and there's been a void.
I wish I could say that Renew America's Joan Swirsky can fill Kaye's shoes, but typically, she can't. This week's Joan Swirsky column, however, is a rare gem worthy of calling "Grogan-esque".
The Obama disaster machine: unfortunate coincidences or malevolently premeditated?
By Joan SwirskyIs it only me, or do the multiple disasters that have struck both well before and ever since the disastrous election of Barack Obama seem fishy to you?
I won't discuss the stock market crash of September 2008 here, although if anything seemed suspiciously timed and deliberately manipulated, it was that! Even before that, we had the specter of a radical leftist of questionable birth origins and contempt for both capitalism and the U.S. Constitution being given a total pass by a strangely incurious media whose members had clearly been intimidated or threatened into a thundering silence.
That's a pretty hefty accusation that Joan throws out there. Apparently, long before he became president, Obama manipulated the stock market crash and intimidated the entire United State press corps.
How did he manage to do that? Well, look at him! He's an intimidating black man!
In the months that followed Obama's "election," we saw literally trillions of dollars in "urgent" bailouts and stimulus packages, all of which brought us escalating unemployment and a skittish if not paranoid stock market.
Right. It was the bailouts and stimulus package that caused a skittish stock market and unemployment -- not the aforementioned stock market crash of September 2008.
We saw a nationally-loathed healthcare bill — gigantic in size and mysterious in content — rammed through Congress with bribes, threats, and intimidation.
"Mysterious in content" if you didn't bother to read it, or even read about it. By the way, who in Congress was bribed, threatened and/or intimidated?
And we saw the attempts by Obama and his fellow leftists to jam an equally-detested cap-and-trade tax down our throats.
Uh.... cap-and-trade isn't a "tax". It's a free market approach to controlling pollution by giving companies incentives not to pollute. Aren't conservatives supposed to love the free market?
Mmmmm. Wasn't that just about the time the tragic West Virginia mine disaster happened, killing 29 of 31 miners? What a coincidence! A "president" who hates coal as an energy source being presented with a putative reason to destroy the coal industry!
Oh, wait. Now Obama was behind the Upper Big Branch mine disaster last April too?!?
Kind of reminds you of the recent BP oil spill, doesn't it? A "president" still pushing the cap-and-trade scheme who reviles domestically-acquired oil — although not the windfall of money BP donated to his presidential campaign — being presented with an oh-so-convenient rationalization to cancel all domestic drilling! Again, what a coincidence!
So... BP donated money to Obama, after which he turned around and stabbed them in the back by causing the oil spill, and then establishing a moratorium on "all" domestic drilling.
Heh. Suckers.
These disasters benefit Obama's agenda, which is to destroy America's potential for energy independence at the same time imposing draconian taxes designed to obliterate the middle class and make the lower class abjectly and forever dependent on the largesse of big government. In short, galloping socialism on the way to freedom-annihilating Communism!
Yup. She's onto him.
Cue full-on crazy.....
A Marxist-Inspired Disaster Central
The route to Obama's hate-America agenda is and always has been to create Alinsky-inspired widespread-and-sustained chaos, the better to keep people off balance, riddled with anxiety, and hoping for the redemption of big government. How else to explain the spate of unprecedented tragedies, catastrophes, and calamities that have struck our own country and around the world, for instance the three Muslim terrorist attacks in the U.S., including the attack at Fort Hood in Texas in which 13 were murdered and 30 injured; the wanton murder of police officers in Seattle; the explosion on New York's Madison Avenue (which authorities claimed was a burst pipe); the calamitous earthquakes in Haiti and Chile; the eruption of the volcano in Iceland that disrupted European air traffic; the airline crash in Russia that killed the president of Poland, on and on.
Also, I stubbed my toe on the coffee table this morning. Damn you, Obama!
But really... Volcanoes? Police shootings? Earthquakes? Plane crashes? Seriously, one has to wonder if Joan is crazy to suggest that the Obama regime is responsible for all those domestic incidents and international natural disasters.
Crazy, you say, to suggest that the Obama regime is responsible for these domestic incidents and international "natural" disasters? Maybe...but consider HAARP. No, not the instrument that David played to King Saul to alleviate the old man's depression. That harp had only one "a" in it. This HAARP is an acronym for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project. The project, controlled by the U.S. Army and Navy, is made up of a dense grouping of gigantic antennae in Alaska which has the ability to generate several billion watts of energy that can be directed at any target. "Any target" meaning an underground fault, an airplane in flight, a fulminating volcano, or a mid-ocean oil rig!
Okay. This is like a bad James Bond movie now.
I tell you though... I think Obama and the U.S. Army and Navy need to do a better job about keeping HAARP secret.
But trust me.... we've only touched the surface of the crazy here.
And what another coincidence — the BP explosion took place just a day before Earth Day!
Also, if you scramble the letters in "Deepwater Horizon", you get "A Rezoned White Pro", which indicates that Obama is going to put all white people in concentration camps!
According to Mississippi resident and radio disk jockey Gina Miller, a number of culprits might be to blame for the disaster:
Oh, well then. If a Mississippi deejay thinks it, it must be true......
"As soon as this happened," Miller wrote, "my gut told me it was no accident. This kind of thing rarely happens, and the timing was just too 'coincidental'..."
So, the BP oil explosion is a conspiracy involving Obama, Al Gore, Muslims, North Korea, Venezuela, and the Red Chinese, using an array of antennae located in Alaska.
Makes perfect sense.
At this date — late-June 2010 — Obama has not escaped plunging approval ratings and a complete erosion of public trust. To an accusation that his "cool" demeanor is inappropriate in the face of the catastrophic oil spill, he says he is suppressing his anger in the service of solving the problem. But Americans know better. By now, every statement emanating from the White House is simply not credible. In fact the truth is often exactly the opposite of what Obama and his henchmen say.
No, it's not anger — at BP, capitalist industry, George Bush, his own impotence — that Obama is suppressing. It is unvarnished glee!
With Sue Simmons!
Glee at the prospect that the industries the spill is destroying (fishing, manufacturing, tourist, et al) and the incalculably high cost of recovery, will force people to throw up their hands in despair and come running to the government for support, and just as important will allow him to nationalize the energy industry, ala Castro, Putin, Chavez, Morales, name your totalitarian!
"Peron, Peron, Peron, Peron, Peron...."
Obama Spits on Every Genuine Solution
Why is Obama still obdurately refusing to use the many technologies that have proven effective in stemming and solving oil spills over the years?
In a riveting article in the San Francisco Chronicle, Yobie Benjamin details the futility of the "cap the gusher" strategy being used, and the perils, both environmental and to human health, of the toxic dispersants being used ("all they do is hide the oil from the surface").
"In 1993," Benjamin writes, "a massive 800-million-gallon oil spill happened in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Aramco successfully cleaned up that spill. The lead engineer that cleaned that spill was an American engineer who worked for Aramco. His name is Nick Pozzi who is currently based in Houston. Pozzi offered his solution to BP and the Coast Guard and they promptly dismissed his solution. Pozzi reported that in Saudi Arabia he successfully used flour (yes, flour for baking) and straw (yes, the one you feed to livestock) to absorb oil. The congealed oil was then mechanically collected and properly disposed of. In the Saudi disaster, Pozzi claimed 85% of the oil was recovered and was still usable."
Well, this is a little different. This is a deep-water oil spill. Most of the spilled oil is underwater, floating in plumes. You can't skim most of it up. But let's not let facts get in the way.
And what about the Florida man who is all over TV right now, demonstrating the stunning efficacy of using straw to absorb the oil and turn the water from jet-black murkiness to crystal-clear transparency?
I think she's referring to the Sham-Wow guy now.
BP hasn't gotten back to him, he said.
No, of course not.
Well, the article goes on, drilling new depths of crazy. You can read the whole thing by clicking the link above. Basically, Joan speculates that Obama, BP, Deep Water Horizon, Halliburton, Citigroup, Goldman-Sachs, the U.S. Government, Warren Buffet, George Soros, John Holdren, and "the convicted felon and Obama pal" Tony Rezko have financial involvement with NALCO, the company that manufactures the toxic dispersants being used to "clean up" the horrific oil spill. Specifically, she writes:
...[E]vidence has also been uncovered that as soon as the oil rig blew, the masterminds of the big-government/big-corporation complex went to work to maximize the financial reward from the disaster — "never let a good crisis go to waste." Investors were advised to buy BP stock, and a major symposium was held involving several key players in the Obama Administration, which focused on modern technological advances in developing 'clean water.' NALCO is the major source for such 'technological advances.'
"Ahhhhh'" as Steve Martin said in The Jerk, "It's a profit deal!"
Well, color me skeptical, Joan. I think if your theories catch on, the smart investment would be shares of tin foil.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment, Right Wing Punditry/Idiocy | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
A New Orleans federal judge lifted the six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling imposed by President Barack Obama following the largest oil spill in U.S. history.
Obama temporarily halted all drilling in waters deeper than 500 feet on May 27 to give a presidential commission time to study improvements in the safety of offshore operations. Government lawyers told U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman that the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon rig off the Louisiana coast in April was a "game changer’’ that exposed the risks of offshore oil exploration.
"We need to make sure deepwater drilling is as safe as we thought it was the day before this incident,’’ Brian Collins, a lawyer for the government, told Feldman in a court hearing June 21. "It is crucial to take the time because to fail to do so would be to gamble with the long-term future of this region.’’
More than a dozen Louisiana offshore service and supply companies sued U.S. regulators to lift the ban. State officials claim 20,000 Louisiana jobs are in jeopardy if the deepwater drilling suspension lasts 18 months.
Judicial activist.
UPDATE: I've taken a gander at the opinion just handed down (it's here in PDF format) and I find it to be short on legal reasoning and high in snark. For example, in a footnote it reads:
The Report [of the Secretary of the Interior] notes that the Deepwater Horizon disaster is "commanding the Department of Interior's resources." A disturbing admission by this Administration.
WTF with the editorializing? And why is it "distrubing" that the Department of Interior is working to the fullest extent on the Deepwater Horizon disaster? Hasn't the criticism been that the Obama Administration hasn't been doing enough?!? And now when we learn that the Department of Interior's resources are heavily involved in fighting the distaster, it is "disturbing"? Really?
Anyway, the Court's reasoned that the decision to put a 6-month moratorium on deep sea drilling was "arbitrary and capricious". Why was it arbitrary and capricious? Because, according to the Court, just because one drill broke and failed doesn't mean they all will.
That's one way to look at it, I suppose. Yet, when a part goes bad in a Boeing-made large passenger plane, don't they require ALL those planes to be rounded and inspected? It's not unheard of.
Hmmmm. Here’s some assorted information on Feldman:
: Judge Feldman graduated from Tulane Law School in 1957, where he was a member of the Order of the Coif, and Assistant Editor of the Tulane Law Review. … His practice emphasized tax law and complex commercial litigation. … On October 12, 1983 he was appointed United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana by President Reagan, and presently serves as the Chairman of the Fifth Circuit’s Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. … Judge Feldman is a member of the Advisory Committee of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, is Chair of the Board of Advisory Editors of the Tulane Law Review, … From 1994 to 2000 he was a lecturer in Constitutional Law and war powers at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Public Administration. … [H]as been a guest lecturer at Amherst College in constitutional interpretation and the philosophy of the Rule of Law.This comment in the Robing Room seems to say it all: "Intelligent, Pompous, egotistical, pushy, arrogant, unfair, no empathy for poor people and workers who come before him, his heart is with business."
Apparently. Well, an appeal is in the works.
UPDATE #2: Yyyyyeah. Thought so. From Think Progress:
Like many judges presiding in the Gulf region, Feldman owns lots of energy stocks, including Transocean, Halliburton, and two of BP’s largest U.S. private shareholders — BlackRock (7.1%) and JP Morgan Chase (28.3%). Here’s a list of Feldman’s income in 2008 (amounts listed unless under $1,000):
JP Morgan Chase, BlackRock ($12000- $36000)
Ocean Energy ($1000 – $2500)
NGP Capital Resources ($1000 – $2500)
Quicksilver Resources ($5000 – $15000)
Hercules Offshore ($6000 – $17500)
Provident Energy
Peabody Energy
PenGrowth Energy
RPC Inc
Atlas Energy Resources
Parker Drilling
TXCO Resources
EV Energy Partners
Rowan Companies
BPZ Resources
El Paso Corp
KBR Inc
Chesapeake Energy
ATP Oil & Gas
UPDATE #3: Another news agency reports:
Judge Feldman held less than $15,000 worth of stock in Transocean, as well as similar amounts (federal rules only require that judges report a range of values ) in Hercules Offshore, ATP Oil and Gas, and Parker Drilling. All of those companies offer contract offshore drilling services and operate offshore rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Judge Feldman also owned between $15,000 and $50,000 in notes offered by Ocean Energy, Inc., a company that offers "concept design and manufacturing design of submersible drilling rigs".
Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 02:11 PM in Breaking News, Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Perspective is everything, and this article puts the oil spill in perspective. And actually, it makes it sound not so bad. Some highlights:
But... it's bad.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 09:34 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Monday, June 21, 2010 at 01:02 PM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 17, 2010 at 12:07 PM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (1)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Wow. Just wow. Here is Rep. Michelle "Crazy As A Loon" Bachmann on the BP escrow fund to compensate Gulf shore residents for their losses:
The president just called for creating a fund that would be administered by outsiders, which would be more of a redistribution-of-wealth fund. And now it appears like we’ll be looking at one more gateway for more government control, more money to government. If there is a disaster, why is it that government is the one who always seems to benefit after a disaster, and that’s of course what cap-and-trade would be.
Well, yes, I suppose the fund does involve redistribution-of-wealth.... in the same sense that when a guy smashes into my car, he has to pay me for the damages to it. Problem?
And the notion that the government benefits from the fund -- well, that's just bizarre. As Bachmann herself acknowledges, the fund will be administered by outsiders, i.e., an independent panel. How does government "benefit"? It doesn't, except for the fact that the fund will prevent the government (and by extension, American taxpayers) from being fiscally responsible for BP’s actions.
UPDATE -- she's not alone. This happened 20 minutes ago....
Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), ranking member of the House Energy committee, where BP's CEO is testifying today, just said "It is a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, in this case a $20 billion shakedown."
He also apologized to BP for Obama's address yesterday and the $20 billion escrow.
What is wrong with these people?
Isn't the real "tragedy of the first proportion" that a private corporation can literally break the Gulf of Mexico -- ruining wildlife, natural resources, and livelilhoods of those who depend on the Gulf -- and have people like Rep. Barton think that's okay?
UPDATE #2 -- TPM has a running list of Republicans who are taking issue with the escrow fund. Jash Marshall adds:
Demonizing particular individuals can go way too far. And we're going to see a lot of it, just as we have in other calamities where the political breakdowns are different. But this almost literal groveling or knee-defense of BP executives is exactly what Democrats will want to show on a national level that Republicans are on the wrong side of this issue. And I suspect it will have a real effect, if only in strengthening a number of embattled incumbents.
Steve Benen echoes:
I find all of this rather bewildering. Given the nature of the crisis, it stood to reason that politicians would be tripping over each other to appear "tougher" on BP than the next guy. What elected official in his/her right mind would want to side with the oil giant responsible for the worst environmental catastrophe in American history? Apparently, we're getting a clearer picture of the answer.
I don't think Republicans have thought through the politics of this. If they don't want to praise the Obama White House for its success with BP yesterday, fine. But the GOP is approaching the point at which Dems will reasonably be able to argue that Republicans are siding with BP over the country
UPDATE #3 -- And now the White House responds...
Statement by the Press Secretary on Congressman Joe Barton's Apology to BP"What is shameful is that Joe Barton seems to have more concern for big corporations that caused this disaster than the fishermen, small business owners and communities whose lives have been devastated by the destruction. Congressman Barton may think that a fund to compensate these Americans is a 'tragedy', but most Americans know that the real tragedy is what the men and women of the Gulf Coast are going through right now. Members from both parties should repudiate his comments."
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 17, 2010 at 09:31 AM in Congress, Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
.... and like all the other posts, the answer is "More than we've been led to believe". Sigh:
The new estimate is 25,000 to 30,000 barrels of oil a day. That range, still preliminary, is far above the previous estimate of 12,000 to 19,000 barrels a day.
These new calculations came as the public wrangling between BP and the White House was reaching new heights, with President Obama asking for a meeting with BP executives next week and his Congressional allies intensifying their pressure on the oil giant to withhold dividend payments to shareholders until it makes clear it can and will pay all its obligations from the spill.
The higher estimates will affect not only assessments of how much environmental damage the spill has done but also how much BP might eventually pay to clean up the mess — and it will most likely increase suspicion among skeptics about how honest and forthcoming the oil company has been throughout the catastrophe.
The new estimate is based on information that was gathered before BP cut a pipe called a riser on the ocean floor last week to install a new capture device, an operation that some scientists have said may have sharply increased the rate of flow. The government panel, called the Flow Rate Technical Group, is preparing yet another estimate that will cover the period after the riser was cut.
The new estimate appears to be a far better match than earlier ones for the reality that Americans can see every day on their televisions. Even though the new capture device is funneling 15,000 barrels of oil a day to a ship at the surface, a robust flow of oil is still gushing from the well a mile beneath the waves.
UPDATE: BBC writes...
As many as 40,000 barrels (1.7 million gallons) of oil a day may have been gushing out from a blown-out Gulf of Mexico well, doubling many estimates.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Friday, June 11, 2010 at 11:10 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (1)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
This is tremendously stupid politics. The public -- particularly Republicans -- are weary of taxpayer bailouts already. Now we want more?
Oh, sure -- count on Republicans to say, "Well, we bailed out the banks. So why not BP?"
But that argument falls flat. The bailout of the banks was necessary to stem the economic downflow. It was designed to make sure that the entire banking system stayed afloat. (And remember, we did let Sheasron Lehman die first).
This is not the same situation. BP messed up. While the oil spill may wreak havoc with BP's bottom dollar, it doesn't send the entire oil industry into turmoil and collapse, unlike the financial sector bailout. Plus, the oil and gas companies get huge tax breaks already.
Also, BP is, you know, British. Let the Brits bail them out.
Democrats need to jump on this one. Politically, it's a huge gamechanger. The 30 second ads write themselves: "Democrats want BP to pay for its spill; Republicans want you to pay for BP's spill."
P.S. Although I agreed with it at the time, and still do, voters might want to be reminded that the bailout of the banks was done when Bush was president.
UPDATE from Josh Marshall, noting that Boehner is backtracking:
Okay, it seems like we know what Boehner meant. It seems he thinks BP should be on the line for everything. But only up to $75 million once the oil itself if cleaned up.
UPDATE: Boehner steps into the ridiculous again --
Washington (CNN) - House Republican Leader John Boehner mocked Congress for holding multiple hearings on the BP oil spill before experts have figured out how to halt oil still gushing into the Gulf. He sarcastically called the packed hearing schedule, "Congress at its best."
"You know, why don't we get the oil stopped, alright? Figure out what the hell went wrong, and then have the hearing and get the damn law fixed!" an exasperated Boehner told reporters at his weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.
I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that figuring out how to cap the spill is in no way impeded by Congress looking into the root cause of the spill. If it is an impediment, then we're in serious trouble.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 10, 2010 at 03:05 PM in Congress, Corporate Greed, Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Thursday, June 10, 2010 at 09:38 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 09, 2010 at 10:15 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment, Obama Opposition | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
As if there wasn't enough oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico, satellite images have revealed a 10-mile-long slick from another drilling rig, which apparently began leaking days after the Deepwater Horizon disaster began.
Citing an environmental group and federal documents, the Mobile, Ala., Press- Register reports that the smaller leak, from the Ocean Saratoga platform, apparently began around April 30 and was noted by federal officials May 15. But they and Diamond Offshore officials aren't saying anything else about it.
The spill was first reported by SkyTruth, which said it accidentally discovered the separate slick while scrutinizing Deepwater Horizon images. Photos taken during overflights "appear to show a large oil crew boat pumping dispersants into the water at the spill site," the Press- Register writes.
Officials at the National Response Center, which is coordinating the massive BP spill, said the Ocean Saratoga leak had been reported, but they would not say exactly when it began. The Coast Guard has not yet responded either.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 09, 2010 at 09:55 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
From Newsweek, presented without comment:
A growing conversation among Christian fundamentalists asks the question that may have been inevitable: is the oil spill in the gulf a sign of the coming apocalypse?
About 60 million white evangelicals live in America, and about one third of them believe that the world will end in their lifetime, according to the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press....
...Now blogs on the Christian fringe are abuzz with possibility that the oil spill is the realization of Revelation 8:8–11. "The second angel blew his trumpet, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea. A third of the sea became blood, a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed … A third of the waters became wormwood, and many died from the water, because it was made bitter." According to Revelation, in other words, something terrible happens to the world's water, a punishment to those of insufficient faith. The foul water, according to the New Oxford Annotated Bible, mirrors one of the plagues God called upon Egypt on behalf of his people Israel.
Though maybe it's Revelation 16:3: "The second angel poured his bowl into the sea, and it became like the blood of a corpse, and every living thing in the sea died."
Some interpreters are very sure: The oil spill matches biblical prophesy and is another predictor of the end. One commenter at Godlike Productions argues that the redness of the oil seen in pictures can be interpreted as blood. "The water is tinted red from the oil … it ACTUALLY looks like blood. coincidence??? NOT!!!!"
UPDATE: J-Walk blog has founded supportive evidence....
Posted by Ken Ashford on Tuesday, June 08, 2010 at 12:02 PM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment, Godstuff | Permalink | Comments (1)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Here's what the oil spill would look like if it was centered at my home:
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 02, 2010 at 04:54 PM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
With hurricane season upon us, questions are being asked about the effect of hurricanes on the oil spill and, conversely, the effects of the oil spill on hurricanes. NOAA has the "answers", although it involves a lot of guesswork, since there's never been a situation where a major hurricane passed through an oil slick of this size.
I have reprinted NOAA's Q&A in its entirety below the fold.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 02, 2010 at 11:52 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment, Weather | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
"Where were the boats that could have been commandeered by the government to be sent into this region to deal with that oil plume as it was coming up to the water and destroying marine life? Nowhere to be found. Why? The administration was hands off on this policy."
I don't get it. If bailing out Wall Street and the car companies is government-engineered socialism, why isn't taking ownership of BP's private assets? Why, here is what Bachmann said only last April on Larry King:
BACHMANN: The story in our country has been the federal government takeover of private industry. The federal government literally, in 18 months’ time, has taken either direct ownership or control of 51 percent of the private economy. Eighteen months ago, 100 percent of the private economy was private. But today, the federal government literally owns banks., the largest insurance company in the United States. The federal government owns over half of all home mortgages today in the United States — Chrysler, G.M. the student loan industry and now health care.
The point for Bachmann and her brethren, obviously, is to lash out hysterically and attack the president. Whether it makes sense or is consistent with her so-called principles is irrelevant. (And I'm sure when she finds out that some little lefty liberals are arguing the same thing, she'll do a complete 180).
I should also note, in passing, that the assertion that the Obama administration has been "hands off" on the oil spill is patently absurd. I understand the frustration that, as yet, there has been no cessation of the leak. But that's not because the government is sitting idly by. It's because nobody -- including the government -- knows exactly how to stop the damned thing. We're in uncharted (and oily) waters.
RELATED: Sarah Palin weighs in with this hilarious tweet...
Yup. You're reading that right. Sarah is taking the Gulf oil spill and doing an "I told you so", as if to say "When I was chanting 'drill baby drill', I didn't mean there. If only you people had listened to me!"
Unfortunately, Sarah has never taken the position that "drill baby drill" was limited to just onshore places. In fact, the opposite. She was the one to convince McCain into supporting offshore drilling! Here's a Q&A from CNBC's “Kudlow & Company” Interview - Jul 31, 2008:
Q: When we talked about a month ago, you told me you were going to persuade Senator McCain to drill in ANWR. Now actually, McCain’s come a long way on drilling Outer Continental Shelf. Have you yet talked him in to ANWR?
A: I have not talked him in to ANWR yet. But yeah, he has evolved into being open enough to say yes to that offshore. Obama certainly hasn’t gone there. We certainly need this. We need it for American security, & for energy independence.
And during the 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Joe Biden, she chastized Obama's position on offshore drilling, calling offshore drilling "safe" and "environmentally-friendly":
BIDEN: We have 3% of the world’s oil reserves. We consume 25% of the oil. John has voted 20 times in the last decade-and-a-half against funding alternative energy sources, clean energy sources, wind, solar, biofuels. McCain thinks, I guess, the only answer is drill, drill, drill. Drill we must, but it’ll take ten years before any [new drilling delivers oil].
PALIN: The chant is “drill, baby, drill.” That’s what we hear across this country in our rallies because people are hungry for those domestic sources of energy to be tapped into. They know that even in my own energy-producing state we have billions of barrels of oil and hundreds of trillions of cubic feet of clean, green natural gas. Barack Obama and Sen. Biden, you’ve said no to everything in trying to find a domestic solution to the energy crisis. You even called drilling -- safe, environmentally-friendly drilling offshore as raping the outer continental shelf.
"Well, that's all from the 2008 campaign," you say. Maybe she had a change of heart since then on the subject of offshore drilling. Nope. There's this from March, 2009:
Salazar went to Alaska this week as part of the process of developing this administration's offshore energy plan. He has called a time out on new leasing, for more public input, and he got plenty Tuesday.Whaling captain and mayor of the North Slope Borough Edward Itta advised slowing down: "Mr. Secretary, like all Alaskans, the people of the North Slope depend on the economic engine of oil and gas development. We have supported onshore for well over 30 years now. But, Mr. Secretary, offshore is a different matter."
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin advised speeding up: "Delays or major restrictions in accessing our needed resources for environmentally responsible development are not in the nation's or our state's best interest."
And just two months ago, in a widely circulated missive, Palin attacked President Obama's plan to open up large swaths of the U.S. coastline to potential drilling for being too little, too late. "[L]et's not forget," she wrote, "that while Interior Department bureaucrats continue to hold up actual offshore drilling from taking place, Russia is moving full steam ahead on Arctic drilling, and China, Russia, and Venezuela are buying leases off the coast of Cuba."
Now, with her tweet, she would like you to forget she said all that. When she led the chants of "drill baby drill", she was only talking about onshore drilling, you stupid "greenies" (despite the fact that she wasn't).
For any other politician, members of the news media would confront them about this obvious hypocrisy. But Sarah avoids those kind of questions (prefering the softball questions of Fox News), so she'll never have to account for her obvious political chicanery and flip-flopping.
What particularly annoys me about this Palin tweet isn't that she's blatently fabricating her own record regarding offshore drilling. It's that she's doing it in an unctious condescending tone, as if we have failed to understand all along that she was warning us about the dangers of offshore drilling ("Now do you get it"?). And yet, we DO get it. We get what she said in the past. And no matter how belittling her tone, it doesn't change what has come out of her mouth. She supported offshore drilling. Period.
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 02, 2010 at 10:05 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment, Obama Opposition | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Posted by Ken Ashford on Wednesday, June 02, 2010 at 09:25 AM in Disasters, Energy and Conservation, Environment | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |


May 4-6 & 10-13, 2012
Shows are Thursday-Saturday at 8pm and Sundays at 2pm
Perhaps Broadway’s greatest farce, this show is light, fast-paced, witty, irreverent and one of the funniest musicals ever written. It provides the perfect escape from life's troubles. The result is a non-stop laugh-fest in which a crafty slave tries to gain his freedom as a reward for his struggles to win the hand of a beautiful but slow-witted courtesan for his young master.
CAST OF CHARACTERS
Pseudolus - Ken Ashford
Hysterium - Gray Smith
Senex - Miles Stanley
Domina - Christine Gorelick
Hero - Charlie Kluttz
Philia - Gracey Falk
Erronius - Lee McKusick
Miles Glorisosus - Mike Orsillo
Marcus Lycus - Neil Shepherd
Proteans - Justin Bulla, Josh Gerry, Bradley Phillis, Jacob Weinberg
Courtesans - Angela Brady, Ashley Howe, Sarah Jenkins, Natalie Juran, Scarlet Van Loon, Mary Lea Williams

FREE at MILLER PARK AMPHITHEATRE
May 19, 20, 26, 27 and June 2, 3 at 1:00 and 4:00 pm (no 4:00 pm on June 3)
Onje of Shakespeare's most-cherished comedies. Benedick and Beatrice are engaged in a very "merry war"; they both talk a mile a minute and proclaim their scorn for love, marriage, and each other. In contrast, Claudio and Hero are sweet young people who are rendered practically speechless by their love for one another. By means of "noting" (which sounds the same as "nothing," and which is gossip, rumour, and overhearing), Benedick and Beatrice are tricked into confessing their love for each other, and Claudio is tricked into rejecting Hero at the altar. However, Dogberry, a Constable who is a master of malapropisms, discovers the evil trickery of the villain, Don John.
CAST OF CHARACTERS
Benedick - Chad Edwards
Beatrice - Sally Meehan
Don Pedro - Mark March
Claudio - Carlos Luis Nieto
Hero - Devon Currie
Leonato - John Shea
Don J - Annie Weir
Margaret - Robyn Shute
Antonio - Lee Willard
Balthasar - Suzanne Vaughan
Borachio - Ken Ashford
Conrade - Rob Taylor
Friar Frances - Linda Minney
Dogberry - April Marshall
Verges - Sarah Jenkins
Sexton - Andrea Rivers
Messenger - Ryan Ball
Boy - Ben Taylor
Watch - True Jones and others TBA


Recent Comments